Prenatal Ultrasound Imaging of Orofacial Clefts: A Pictorial Essay.

Orofacial clefts (OFCs), including cleft lip (CL), cleft palate (CP), and CL with palate (CL/P), are relatively common congenital birth defects occurring in approximately 1 in 500 to 1 in 2500 live births. Detecting OFCs during prenatal ultrasound screening is crucial for informed decision-making and multidisciplinary medical care. This review provides a practical guide for routine and advanced screening for OFCs during mid-pregnancy. The Maarse classification system facilitates effective communication among the multidisciplinary team, categorizing OFCs into five types. Basic ultrasound views encompass coronal, sagittal, and axial imaging of the face and hard palate. Additional visualization techniques are employed in case of suspected anomalies during the initial screening. Advanced ultrasound views provided by the expert in prenatal OFC diagnosis include imaging of the posterior edge of the hard palate and the posterior part of the soft palate. Detected OFCs exhibit a range of severity and affect different structures, underscoring the importance of accurate detection and classification for appropriate treatment planning. Implementing a standardized screening protocol for OFCs is essential. By enhancing detection rates and enabling early diagnosis, prenatal ultrasound screening contributes to improved patient outcomes and facilitates timely intervention by the multidisciplinary team. In conclusion, this review emphasizes the significance of standardized protocols and specialized techniques for prenatal ultrasound screening of OFCs. Early detection and classification of these malformations play a vital role in comprehensive management, ensuring that affected individuals and their families receive the appropriate care and support they need.

Multidisciplinary team approach to the prenatal management of orofacial clefts: a single center cohort study in Taiwan.

Advances in ultrasound fetal diagnostics and treatment have created a dilemma for doctors and parents: choosing whether to continue with a pregnancy as well as choosing between various treatment options. A multidisciplinary approach has been widely accepted in the management of other prenatally diagnosed anomalies and has shown superior results compared to routine care. We present a retrospective cohort of patients prenatally diagnosed with orofacial clefts who were offered consultation by an expert multidisciplinary team, including: a fetal medicine specialist, an obstetrician, a plastic surgeon, and a case managing nurse. We analyzed factors influencing parents' decision to utilize a consultation service, as well as their decision about pregnancy continuation. Our results suggest that the presence of other anomalies and maternal age heavily influenced the decision about the uptake of consultations. If consulted by the team, parents tended to continue with the pregnancy, even when accounting for fetal gender and maternal age. On the other hand, having a consultation had varying effects depending on the cleft type. The findings suggest that multidisciplinary consultations may be an efficient approach in managing pregnancies complicated by orofacial cleft anomalies; which may help in preventing unnecessary pregnancy terminations and developing a sufficient postnatal care plan.

Safety and efficacy of unidirectional barbed suture in mini-laparotomy myomectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the safety and effectiveness of unidirectional knotless barbed suture compared to the traditional suture for repair of uterine wall defects through myomectomy via mini-laparotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective clinical study performed by a single surgeon in a medical center. Sixty-eight women with symptomatic myoma were enrolled. Their uterine wall defects were repaired either by unidirectional knotless barbed suture (Group A) or by traditional suture (Group B). The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of myomas in the two groups were analyzed by two-sample t test. RESULTS: Surgical time required from skin incision to complete closure was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (50.2 ± 16.49 vs. 69.1 ± 25.33 min) (p = 0.0008). The intraoperative blood loss was also lower in Group A (mean, 260.9 mL; range, 20-850 mL) than in Group B (mean, 394.7 mL; range, 50-2200 mL) but not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The unidirectional knotless barbed suture may facilitate the repair of uterine defects during mini-laparotomy myomectomy by significantly lowering operative time. It may also reduce the intraoperative blood loss.